September 8, 2021

Explaining How Research Works

Understanding Research infographic
Printable version

We鈥檝e heard 鈥渇ollow the science鈥 a lot during the pandemic. But it seems science has taken us on a long and winding road filled with twists and turns, even changing directions at times. That鈥檚 led some people to feel they can鈥檛 trust science. But when what we know changes, it often means science is working.

Expaling How Research Works Infographic en espa帽ol
Printable version

Explaining the scientific process may be one way that science communicators can help maintain public trust in science. Placing research in the bigger context of its field and where it fits into the scientific process can help people better understand and interpret new findings as they emerge. A single study usually uncovers only a piece of a larger puzzle.

Questions about how the world works are often investigated on many different levels. For example, scientists can look at the different atoms in a molecule, cells in a tissue, or how different tissues or systems affect each other. Researchers often must choose one or a finite number of ways to investigate a question. It can take many different studies using different approaches to start piecing the whole picture together.

Sometimes it might seem like research results contradict each other. But often, studies are just looking at different aspects of the same problem. Researchers can also investigate a question using different techniques or timeframes. That may lead them to arrive at different conclusions from the same data.

Using the data available at the time of their study, scientists develop different explanations, or models. New information may mean that a novel model needs to be developed to account for it. The models that prevail are those that can withstand the test of time and incorporate new information. Science is a constantly evolving and self-correcting process.

Scientists gain more confidence about a model through the scientific process. They replicate each other鈥檚 work. They present at conferences. And papers undergo聽peer review, in which experts in the field review the work before it can be published in scientific journals. This helps ensure that the study is up to current scientific standards and maintains a level of integrity. Peer reviewers may find problems with the experiments or think different experiments are needed to justify the conclusions. They might even offer new ways to interpret the data.

It鈥檚 important for science communicators to consider which stage a study is at in the scientific process when deciding whether to cover it. Some studies are posted on preprint servers for other scientists to start weighing in on and haven鈥檛 yet been fully vetted. Results that haven't yet been subjected to scientific scrutiny should be reported on with care and context to avoid confusion or frustration from readers.

We鈥檝e developed a one-page guide, "How Research Works: Understanding the Process of Science"聽to help communicators put the process of science into perspective. We hope it can serve as a useful resource to help explain why science changes鈥攁nd why it鈥檚 important to expect that change. Please take a look and share your thoughts with us by sending an email to聽sciencehealthandpublictrust@mail.nih.gov.

Below are some additional resources: